New to the page? Start Here! Click the title below to read more.

Any other time than this.

  For a long time, I have been aching to start writing again. I would say, "if I had a laptop", or "when I can find the right...

Friday, July 01, 2022

WTH?

 Hello my dear bloggees. I hope you are all well. This past month there has been a lot going on in the world, and while I intend to stick to my word about not complaining nor speaking of politics, there are a few things I would like to discuss, that are related to both complaining and politics, but I am not going to either complain nor speak about the political side of the politics.- but bear with me please. Most of this is going to be questions not opinions or answers.


Now unless you are, well, unable to hear or see, I am sure you are aware of the Roe V.Wade being overturned. Well, my question is, why? You have all of these protests now, but has anyone asked the question why? Seriously. Why all of a sudden is this even coming up.  They are taking a decision from the 1970s and out of nowhere decide they need to make a new decision.  I mean, don't they have anything better to do? We have so many other pressing issues with the judicial system that this just seems out of place.  I mean, lets just do away with Habeus Corpus and reestablish slavery while we are at it. -total sarcasm, I do not believe either of these should occur.


If they want to tighten regulations, ok, do it. But don't make this black and white, because the fact of the matter is that it is not black an white.  It really is situational. But has anyone asked the court why this is happening and what  influenced their decision??? If it were any of us going to court asking for a change or something to be put into effect, I know first hand that we are required to go through a lengthy written process of making the request AND more importantly, WHY we are making this request. So why are they not required to do the same. And what of a jury? shouldn't they be required to have a massive group of individuals assisting in the decision, not just a group of fellow lawmakers/judges, etc. which in it of itself is a bit bias, and may even be a conflict of interest-something that is a big NO in the legal system? 

I am in no way an expert here, and if I am way off base here, I am willing to hear it, but, man, what is going on in this world.  We have to follow the rules but the rule makers don't.

Anyways, I really never wanted to talk about this kind of thing here, but since I had to "vent" I suppose, I will keep it short.  Im done with my inneffective complaining now-actually it wasn't quite complaining, just asking questions.  But, I do have to close for now.  Would love to hear your comments, but for the sake of avoiding arguments-which there are enough of in this life, please refrain from stating whether you are pro or against anything related to this topic. Let's try to keep the conversation unbiased, educated and cordially informative. Thank you.

Be safe out there! Don't forget your smiles, and hugs to the ones that need one!!

Take care, 



No comments:

Post a Comment